Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Number (n) and percentage (%) of swIAV positive (Ct < 40) samples and samples with Ct-values (Ct ≤ 33) by influential factors viral load, swIAV subtype, stabilizer type, time after spiking and temperature

From: Effect of stabilizers on the detection of swine influenza A virus (swIAV) in spiked oral fluids over time

Factors

Parameter

swIAV RNA positive

Ct-values ≤ 33

Viral load

High

63/64 (98%)

53/63 (84%)

 

Low

46/64 (72%)

23/46 (50%)

swIAV subtype

H1avN2

56/64 (88%)

40/56 (71%)

 

H1pdmN2

53/64 (83%)

36/53 (68%)

Stabilizer

Yes

90/96 (94%)

64/90 (71%)

 

No (Control)

19/32 (59%)

12/19 (63%)

 

NucleoProtect VET Reagent®

29/32 (91%)

20/29 (69%)

 

Primestore®

29/32 (91%)

21/29 (72%)

 

Sigma-Virocult®

32/32 (100%)

23/32 (72%)

Time after spiking

0 h

32/32 (100%)

32/32 (100%)

 

72 h

27/32 (84%)

17/27 (63%)

 

168 h (7 d)

27/32 (84%)

15/27 (56%)

 

336 h (14 d)

23/32 (72%)

12/23 (52%)

Temperature

4 °C

57/64 (89%)

42/57 (74%)

 

22 °C

52/64 (81%)

34/52 (65%)